Local Voices. Northern Values. Alaska's Future.
Cook Inlet's natural gas supply is running down, utilities are warning of shortfalls and rate shocks, and the state has no single fix on the shelf. We rank the realistic options—from imported LNG to wind, hydro, and new drilling—by cost, timeline, and who ultimately pays.
National consultants keep trying to fit Alaska into a red-and-blue framework, and they keep getting it wrong. The state's voters—gun-owning conservationists, privacy-minded progressives, resource-development pragmatists—offer a preview of an America tired of party labels.
For towns no road can reach, the Alaska Marine Highway System is the grocery truck, the school bus, and the ambulance all in one. As operating costs climb and cutbacks loom, coastal communities are asking a hard question: what does it cost to be left behind?
A growing wave of remote workers, recruited by Lower-48 tech firms and startups, is quietly reshaping Alaska's workforce landscape. While advocates see an opportunity to reverse the state's long-standing professional drain, others warn that an influx of high-earning remote employees could deepen tensions with traditional Alaskan industries and communities. The question is no longer whether Alaska can attract outside talent—it is whether that talent will put down roots or simply pass through.
Alaska's celebrated status as one of only a handful of states with no income tax is frequently cited as a point of pride and a competitive advantage. But a closer examination of the state's revenue structure reveals a system that distributes its burdens and benefits in ways that rarely favor working Alaskans, rural communities, or the public services upon which they depend. The conversation about who actually pays—and who actually gains—in Alaska's fiscal arrangement is long overdue.
Alaska's adoption of ranked-choice voting and open primaries has transformed the state into an unlikely laboratory for electoral reform, drawing researchers, political operatives, and reform advocates from across the country. The system has already produced outcomes that would have been impossible under traditional party-controlled primaries, reshaping how candidates campaign and how voters engage. Whether Alaska's model can—or should—travel south is now a serious question in electoral reform ci
Across Alaska, roads are buckling, buildings are tilting, and utility lines are snapping—not from neglect, but from the ground itself giving way. As permafrost degradation accelerates, municipalities and state planners are confronting infrastructure repair bills that dwarf available budgets, forcing a reckoning over who pays and how priorities get set. The answers will define Alaska's fiscal landscape for a generation.
Alaska's universities are producing graduates who increasingly pack their diplomas and head south, drawn by salaries, career ladders, and professional networks that the state has yet to build. The consequences extend far beyond individual ambition—reaching into Alaska's tax base, its innovation capacity, and its long-term economic resilience. Understanding why they leave, and what it would take to keep them, may be among the most consequential policy questions the state faces this decade.
Alaska-based businesses have long defied the odds, competing against Lower 48 corporations with deeper pockets and cheaper supply chains. Understanding what gives homegrown enterprises their edge—and how state policy can reinforce it—may be among the most consequential economic questions Alaska faces in the decade ahead.
As permafrost thaw accelerates across Alaska, entire communities are being displaced, roads are vanishing, and the legal boundaries that define where Alaskans live and vote are struggling to keep pace. The intersection of climate science and electoral law is producing questions that no redistricting manual has ever had to answer.
Across Alaska's municipalities, thawing permafrost is buckling roads, tilting buildings, and rupturing water lines—leaving local governments to absorb staggering costs that federal climate pledges have yet to meaningfully address. As the damage accelerates, a fundamental question of financial responsibility remains unanswered: who is actually obligated to pay for a crisis that no single community created? This investigation examines the widening gap between Washington's climate commitments and t
Across Alaska's most remote school districts, a deepening shortage of qualified educators is leaving classrooms understaffed, students underserved, and entire communities facing an uncertain future. The crisis cuts especially hard in Indigenous villages, where schools serve not only as centers of learning but as anchors of cultural identity. Without urgent intervention, the consequences may prove irreversible.
National political action committees, dark money networks, and out-of-state donors are pouring unprecedented sums into Alaska's state and local races—often advancing agendas that have little to do with the concerns of everyday Alaskans. A closer look at recent campaign finance data reveals troubling transparency gaps that leave voters in the dark about who is really funding the candidates on their ballots.
Across rural Alaska, inadequate internet infrastructure is doing far more than slowing download speeds — it is costing residents jobs, medical care, and the basic economic footing that sustains community life. As better-connected regions attract the businesses and young workers that Alaska's villages desperately need, state policymakers face mounting pressure to treat broadband not as a luxury, but as essential public infrastructure.
Across Alaska's cities and coveted communities, soaring housing costs are driving out the very workers who keep local schools, clinics, and public services running. A convergence of geographic constraints, construction barriers, and speculative investment has created conditions where earning a professional salary no longer guarantees the ability to live where you work. Understanding how this crisis unfolded—and what other high-cost frontier regions are doing about it—may determine whether Alaska
Alaska's salmon fisheries have long been the economic and cultural backbone of communities stretching from the Kenai Peninsula to the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. But as stocks decline and competing interests collide, the question of who governs these waters — and for whom — has never been more urgent or more contested.
Major oil and gas corporations are deploying millions of dollars in lobbying expenditures and political contributions to reshape Alaska's environmental regulatory framework, exploiting new terrain exposed by accelerating permafrost thaw. As legislative battles intensify in Juneau, a coalition of indigenous communities, conservation organizations, and ordinary Alaskans is pushing back against what they describe as a systematic dismantling of the state's environmental safeguards.
Across Alaska's most isolated communities, clinic doors are closing and medical professionals are leaving at a pace the state's health infrastructure cannot absorb. The compounding pressures of extreme cost of living, geographic isolation, and systemic underfunding have pushed rural healthcare to a breaking point—and the consequences are being measured in lives. What remains to be seen is whether the solutions being tested in a handful of determined communities can scale before it is too late.
For generations, subsistence hunting and fishing have formed the backbone of Alaskan life—feeding families, sustaining cultures, and defining what it means to belong to this land. Today, a convergence of federal jurisdictional disputes, shifting wildlife patterns, and outside political pressures is placing those traditions in serious jeopardy. What is lost if subsistence protections erode is not merely a legal privilege, but a civilization.
Across rural Alaska, thawing permafrost is doing more than warping roads and tilting homes — it is exposing deep gaps in property law, insurance coverage, and disaster policy that leave Alaskan landowners with few protections and even fewer options. As the ground beneath entire communities becomes unstable, state lawmakers and local officials are confronting a governance crisis that federal frameworks were never designed to address.